On April 8, 2026, Charleston's Board of Architectural Review voted 3-1 to grant preliminary approval to a 300-unit apartment building at 295 Calhoun Street, the second of three reviews the project needs before it can break ground. Neighbors who have been showing up to public meetings since 2021 might read that vote as the moment the neighborhood's character got decided. It wasn't. That moment happened in 2020, when Charleston's Planning Commission rezoned the 2.1-acre parcel from an 85-foot/30-foot height allowance to Height District 7, meaning seven stories, and the property changed hands from the Medical University of South Carolina to an Augusta-based developer for close to $12 million.
Everything that has happened since, the denials, the lawsuit, the story cut from the top of the design, was a fight over how the building would look. It was never a fight over whether it would get built. That distinction matters if you are shopping for a home in Harleston Village right now, because it tells you something the median price on any listing feed cannot: the zoning envelope on a given block is often decided years before the current comprehensive plan exists, and that envelope does not reset itself just because city planning philosophy has since changed.
Here is what actually happened at 295 Calhoun. Charleston's Planning Commission approved the height district change in June 2020, before the city's current comprehensive plan and before its Water Plan flagged the parcel's exposure to flooding along Alberta Long Lake. The Limit of Moderate Wave Action line runs through part of the site, a technical detail that forced the developer to move the ground-floor retail component from the lakeside facade to the Calhoun Street side just to meet current code.
None of that changed the underlying entitlement. Once a parcel is rezoned and sold on the strength of that zoning, the owner holds what the Preservation Society of Charleston itself has called a vested right to build within it, subject only to architectural review. The Board of Architectural Review can push back on articulation, materials, setbacks, and massing. It cannot say no to density the zoning code already permits. Historic Charleston Foundation made this point explicitly when it opposed the original 2020 redistricting, arguing at the time that either height was too tall for a site next to a neighborhood where the surrounding buildings run two and three stories. The city's own preservation advocates lost that argument before the design fight even began.
Between April 2022 and March 2023, the Board of Architectural Review-Large rejected the design four times, with the developer, Southeastern Development Associates, returning each time with revisions. Much of that fight centered on an eighth story the board's own architectural merit standard wouldn't support. By January 2023 the developers had removed it, cutting the design to seven stories, and Jason Long, the company's vice president, said the team had reduced the building's scale, height, and mass. The board rejected the seven-story version anyway that March, its fourth denial in two years.
The fight then moved to the courts. Southeastern sued the city, challenging the Board of Architectural Review's authority to reject the project at all, and in November 2023 a circuit court judge allowed the Preservation Society of Charleston to intervene, noting that roughly 130 of the Society's members live in Harleston Village and would have to live with whatever the ruling produced. The project didn't return to the board for another year and a half. When it did, in September 2024, a reworked design credited in part to newly hired local architects earned the project its first conceptual approval, the first of the three approvals it needs before construction can start.
The design has changed little since. Joe McGee, president of the Harleston Village Association, made clear after the April 2026 vote that the neighborhood's fight was never really about stopping the building. It was about the infrastructure around it. As he put it in a statement, the association's position is:
"not opposition to development, but a call for context-sensitive approach."
That is not a neighborhood association claiming victory. It is one acknowledging that the zoning fight was already lost in 2020, and that the only leverage left is over design details and infrastructure funding. As of this writing, a final design review and sign-off from the city's Technical Review Committee on stormwater and traffic capacity remain pending.
If you're comparing Harleston Village to nearby peninsula neighborhoods, the 295 Calhoun timeline is worth more than a curiosity. It is a working example of how to read any parcel's real development ceiling. The current height district designation on a block tells you what can legally be built there today, independent of how the surrounding streetscape actually looks. A block that reads as two-story Charleston singles right up until the moment a 2020-era rezoning surfaces on a specific lot is not an anomaly. Charleston's peninsula has more of these legacy entitlements sitting quietly on the books than a walk down the street would suggest.
This is also why the Harleston Village Association's public position has shifted from fighting the building to fighting for Transportation Sales Tax funding to fix Calhoun Street itself. The corridor already carries an estimated 27,000 vehicles a day and floods routinely, by the association's own account, and a 300-unit building with structured parking will add to both problems whether or not anyone likes its cornice details. If you're evaluating a home within a few blocks of Calhoun, the open question isn't whether density is coming. It's whether the street infrastructure gets funded before or after it arrives.
Layer onto this a second thing worth knowing before you anchor a decision to a single headline number. Harleston Village is a small, high-value market, and different slices of the same data tell noticeably different stories depending on what's being measured and when.
| What's being measured | Time window | Price | Days on market |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homes that closed, trailing 12 months | through April 2026 | roughly $1.28 million median | roughly 46 to 48 days |
| Homes that closed in a single recent month | February 2026 | $1.3 million median, down about 20% from a year earlier | 74 days, down from 112 the year before |
| Homes currently listed and still on the market | mid-2026 snapshot | roughly $2.7 million average | roughly 186 days average |
Read across that table and the takeaway isn't that Harleston Village is cooling or overheating. It's that a neighborhood with only a handful of closings in any given month will produce a headline percentage swing (that 20% year-over-year drop) that says more about which specific houses happened to sell than about the market's direction. And the gap between the 46-day figure for closed sales and the 186-day figure for active listings tells you that homes priced to reflect what buyers are actually paying move in under two months, while homes priced aspirationally sit for a season or more. The median on any single portal snapshot is a starting point for a conversation, not a verdict.
Does the 295 Calhoun project affect home values on the other side of Colonial Lake? The parcel sits on Calhoun Street across from the Medical District, several blocks from Colonial Lake itself. Its direct impact is most relevant to properties along the Calhoun corridor and the streets that feed into it, where added traffic and a larger building footprint will be most noticeable.
Is the Calhoun Street corridor project actually going to get funded? As of this writing it has not been finalized. The Harleston Village Association has flagged Calhoun Street drainage improvements as part of Charleston County's draft Transportation Sales Tax list, but that is advocacy for future funding, not a completed project.
How do I check a specific address's height district myself? The city posts Board of Architectural Review agendas publicly, including parcel-level height district information, ahead of each meeting. It's the same record neighborhood associations and preservation groups use to track projects like this one before they ever reach a for-sale sign.
If you're weighing a purchase in Harleston Village and want a read on a specific block, not just the neighborhood average, that's the kind of detail worth a conversation before you write an offer. Anna Gruenloh has spent two decades tracking exactly these kinds of zoning and entitlement questions on the Charleston peninsula. Let's connect.
Stay up to date on the latest real estate trends.
invest
Using a Self Directed IRA to Invest in Real Estate
Anna prides herself in knowing not only the properties that are available on the market but also the people that live and work in Charleston. Anna has a knack for quickly understanding her clients’ bottom-line needs and guiding them toward the home or investment property that will best suit them.